+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: gooseneck sources

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orinda, California
    Posts
    2,311
    Roller furling was an option on both the Ariel and Commander. Most of the Ariels in the SF fleet that were originally equipped with roller furling changed to jiffy (slab) reefing.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Forsyth GA
    Posts
    396
    Bill, Does the SF fleet simply live with the shorter boom and I would assume smaller mail sail or is the boom replaced? Although 5 inches doesn't amount to much. I couldn't imagine pulling rearward on the boom and then twisting to shorten the sail as described in another post above. It isn't likely you would be doing this when becalmed, more than likely in a blow when you have already waited to long to reef. Have you seen a reefing boom with a crank handle to rotate the boom ( on an Ariel)?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orinda, California
    Posts
    2,311
    The "pull and roll" system was the standard boom gooseneck arrangement. The "roller" system (with crank) was an upgrade. As far as I can tell, the mainsail dimensions remain the same for both. "Jeffy reefing," especially with the lines running to the cockpit, is faster, safer and maintains a better sail shape.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Gooseneck
    By pmorgan in forum Technical
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-10-2018, 05:35 AM
  2. thru-hulls, delamination and fiberglass work - oh, my!
    By captain crunchie in forum Technical
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-23-2004, 11:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts